Democrats Don't Care About Fiscal Responsibility

President Obama was re-elected because people are convinced they will get "stuff" and it will be subsidized by the rich.

After all, the Democrats are of the mindset that wealthy, successful people owe something to the rest of us.

We contributed something towards "infrastructure", and in return Joe Rich Guy should pay for our kids' college educations.

See how it works?

Fork it over, rich guys! Your success is our meal ticket!

Mao Zedong would be proud of President Obama.

'Nuff said.

What Stupid Liberals Believe

From an internet political forum:

"remember folks, cons hate the poor and want to kill them off like bugs 

that's how they think of other people

I've seen them convert to the rush limbaugh/ fox dogma over the years and they are definitely brainwashed zombies who would kill for their masters"

Somebody actually posted that.

How do you counteract such stupidity? Do liberal Democrats really feel they need a public that dumbed down to keep them in power?

It's the Democrats' form of  "Idiocracy".

DNC Hatefest Clusterflop: What The Dems Have Become

This Week's Democratic National Convention symbolized what a once-great political party has become:

That is, the strained support of our President, who has gotten everything he wanted, yet hasn't affected our dismal economy in a positive way.

President Obama got a Stimulus bill passed without a single Republican vote in the House, and only 3 in the Senate (this is what Democrats call "bipartisan"), which was supposed to create jobs and jump-start the economy though expensive government projects. We're still at over 8% unemployment and now power-diving deeper into debt, thanks to this bill, which appears to have mostly benefited teachers' salaries and pensions. I have a blog that deals with the government waste this program subsidizes.

President Obama got his "Obamacare" healthcare bill passed, which puts the United States on track to single payer or Universal Healthcare, despite what Obama's defenders will tell you. He accomplished this through an end-run around the will of the people with the Congressional "reconcilation" process, because 2/3rds of the American people wanted Obama to focus on economic recovery FIRST, before strapping the country down to an expensive new entitlement program. No Republicans voted for Obamacare, which in the meantime has effectively slowed down the expansion of small to medium sized businesses who aren't sure what burdens they'll be forced to take on due this massive government takeover of healthcare.

Barack Obama has suggested that Mitt Romney isn't ready to deal with international politics, when Obama was elected with NO foreign policy experience, and has made blunder after embarrassing blunder on the international stage.

Sorry, Mr. President, but there are other threats to us besides Al Qaeda, and Vladimir Putin's sword rattling deserves some concern. Our relationship with the former USSR is strained, and you don't seem to get it. Also, the fact that you have snubbed Israel and think that tossing them a little foreign aid will placate them is just plain stupid on your part. The world buys a lot of its energy from the Middle east and Israel represents an island of stability in a sea of political unrest. It's plain that your concern for Israel is only for securing the liberal Jewish voter bloc.


Obama's funniest moment at the DNC was when he said, "You didn't elect me to tell what you wanted to hear, you elected me to tell you the truth."

So, what was the purpose of the big "pillar speech" in Colorodo, Mr. Obama, when you told us "we are the people we've been waiting for", and your election will mark the time when the "oceans began to rise"?



Obama said that if he couldn't reduce the deficit by one half he was a "one term proposition".

Obama promised "shovel-ready projects" and then admitted "they weren't as shovel-ready as we thought", to the sound of chuckling over his admission.

Are you admitting, Mr. President, that you're just another professional "say anything to get elected" politician?


It's 3 1/2 years into Obama's 1st term, and he's been campaigning for the last year or so. When recently asked about how Obama would grade his own performance, he responded with "an incomplete".

I'm sorry, Mr. President, but think back to your college days. If you had handed an incomplete assignment to one of your professors, that would have been counted as a "fail".

DNC Clusterflop, The Fear 'n' Smear Fest

I didn't need to watch much of the DNC, because it was entirely predictable. I knew it was going to be 3 nights of repeating the same boring worn-out Obama talking points, embellishment of Obama's so-called "accomplishments", and the lame mock-and-ridicule tactics that the Democrats use in place of an actual record to run on.

And then when you couple that with the moving of the outdoor arena speech back to the indoor venue, you get a recipe for disappointment. You know, I haven't heard any mention of whether or not the DNC is going to refund the ticket money to the people that got shut out. How much do you want to bet those ticket holders are out of luck?

"Sorry, Charlie, you just made a donation to the Chosen One."

The most pathetic moment was bringing on their favorite has-been, Bill Clinton, who stands as living proof that Democrats have few, if any, morals. Only the Democrats would make a god out of a draft-dodging philandering liar who plea-bargained his fanny out of civil trials his last day in office. Bill Clinton is an absolute disgrace to the presidency, yet he is still worshiped by the Democrats as if he were divine. It was truly disgusting to watch Bill Clinton wiggle that crooked finger of his as he spoke... the same crooked finger he used when he said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky."

The other truly laughable moment was EX-governor Granholm mocking Romney's car elevator in defense of Obama's GM bailout, (which looks like may wind up in a bankruptcy filing anyway). Is a car elevator really a political issue? Maybe somebody needs to remind the former governor of one of the most economically depressed states in the country that at least a car elevator means a job or 2.

Obama? Same old tired crap. By his own standards in 2008, he's failure, but we still need to "stay the course"... we've come so far, we can't turn around when we're so close to driving off the cliff!

I knew it was going to be a freaking circus, which is why I chose to watch the football season opener. I wonder if "Honey Boo-Boo" drew a bigger audience than old Mr. Wigglefinger. At least she's cute and fresh, vs. a tired old windbag with a voice like an out-of-tune bagpipe. What's funnier is that his wife wasn't even there to cheer her old man on.

THAT speaks volumes about Bill Clinton and his fading celebrity status.

And it says even more about the shrill Cirque Du Stupide that was the 2012 Democratic National Convention.

"Michelle" Kosilek: Another Liberal Outrage

As Liberal Democrats scream and cry about wasting taxpayer funds on "unfunded wars", the "military industrial complex" or "tax cuts for the rich", we taxpayers get yet another wonderful waste of money thrown at us: a judge has ordered a TAXPAYER-funded "gender-reassignment surgery" procedure for convicted murderer (soon be be murderess, according to liberal groupthink) Robert "Michelle" Kosilek.

This malarkey began 12 years when Kosilek was diagnosed by prison shrinks as having "Gender Identity Disorder"... you know, the old "I'm a woman trapped in a man's body" claim. Since the politicization of the American Psychology Association and reclassification of various sexual dysfunctions, we're now being forced to foot the bill for a surgical procedure which is not medically necessary by any traditional definition. It's cosmetic. Sex change operations don't fix DNA. "Michelle" will always be genetically a male despite his outward appearance.

First of all, what's disgusting is that a private attorney was hired to represent Kosilek. I assume the taxpayer gets hit with this bill, too. Lawyers make 300 dollars an hour. Thanks, libs.

Second is all the outpouring of sympathy for this killer. The LGBT community is applauding this decision, because it will help this poor shattered soul.

According to the Boston Globe:

“It’s great to see a judge recognize that transition-related health care is medically necessary health care and that transgender prisoners are entitled to the same health care that other folks who are incarcerated receive,” said Kristina Wertz, director of policy and programs at the Transgender Law Center in San Francisco.

Medically necessary for what? The guy lives in 8 x 10 box until he takes a dirt nap. What will a sex change operation gain him? And why should it matter? He's serving time for FIRST DEGREE MURDER. He should have been executed as justice for killing his wife.

Here's another tidbit from the Huffington Post:

[Judge Mark]Wolf noted that Kosilek's gender-identity disorder has caused her such anguish that she has tried to castrate herself and twice tried to commit suicide.

I guess prisoner Kosilek's desire to become a girl has caused him more anguish than strangling his wife, dumping her body in a car, and then trying to escape justice. Cue the violin music, please.

In Kosilek's case, the judge said, female hormones have "helped somewhat," but the inmate "continues to suffer intense mental anguish" because she truly believes she is a woman trapped in a man's body.
"That anguish alone constitutes a serious medical need," Wolf wrote. "It also places him at high risk of killing himself if his major mental illness is not adequately treated."

Does anybody care any more about the anguish Kosilek's wife went through as her husband choked the life out her, or the anguish his wife's family felt when their loved one was murdered?

What's even more sickening is that, while our President told a woman that under Obamacare granny may get pills instead of a pacemaker due to her age, we get to fully fund a sex change operation for a 57 year old convicted murderer who will never walk free again.

Here's an idea: if prisoner Kosilek can't handle life in prison, give him pills. He can have all the Paxcil he wants. Why do we need to feel sympathy for human being who is so selfish, that he feels he should get what he wants after denying a long life to his spouse, whom he was supposed to love and cherish forever?

Where's the justice here? And why doesn't the LGBT community try to set some moral standards?

Prison is DENIAL of the freedom you willingly walk away from when you commit a serious crime. That should include killers who think they should get taxpayer funded cosmetic surgery. This is a slap in the face to Kosilek's dead wife and her family. If he decides he no longer wants to live, let him have his way.

'Nuff said.

All You Need To Know About The DNC...

From moonbattery.com... this is just TOO FUNNY!

KUDOS to the awesome artwork!

'Nuff said.

I Think Limbaugh May Be Right... Again

...when it comes to his idea that the Mainstream Media and the Press have a huge investment of their reputations tied up in Barack Obama, and their reactions to Paul Ryan's acceptance speech proves it.

The press, mainstream news, and left wing blogs are furiously fact-checking everything that comes from the mouths of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan and exploiting anything that doesn't suit their idea of what is "factually correct".

Take for example Ryan's comments about the GM plant that closed in spite of Obama's campaign promise to help it retool and stay open for another century.

The unified response is that "the decision was made by GM to close the plant before Obama took office".
Okay, guys, if that's true, it proves at best that Obama shot his mouth off again before checking his facts.

Here is the actual fact-checking article by the Washington Examiner, which contains copies of actual GM documents and is being virtually IGNORED by the mainstream media, Politifact, and Left Wing bloggers:

http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2506462

There is also a slew of defenses over the claims that Ryan's speech was filled with lies:

http://washingtonexaminer.com/a-defense-of-paul-ryans-speech/article/2506511

http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2012/08/30/yes-paul-ryan-spoke-the-truth-about-obamas-fiscal-record/

http://babalublog.com/2012/08/paul-ryans-speech-in-a-nutshell-poop-vs-math-vs-poop-checkers/

http://www.freedomreport.org/era-of-media-fact-checkers-intimidating-republicans-is-over/

The REAL fact is that the mainstream media, left wing news channels, and left wing blogs are in unison on the 5 things they claim Paul Ryan lied about in his acceptance speech, even when they can be shown as factually incorrect in their criticisms.

Those sites which call themselves "fact checkers" are simply using the official DNC position as their reference point. Please don't lecture me on how biased Fox news is, when you have Rachel Maddow making factually incorrect assumptions against Conservatives, and blogs like HuffPo and Kos publishing anti-Republican hit pieces or lame op-eds that claim Fox News anchors are made up to look like prostitutes, for example.

These "fact-check" outlets are proving themselves to be Pravda-like tools of the Democrat Political machine, and people are beginning to wake up to this fact.

Go get 'em, Mr. Ryan. We believe you over the crapola being spewed by DNC mouthpieces like PolitiHack. com.

Bill Maher, Blowhard Deluxe

"Republicans don't have to accept Evolution, Economics, Climatology, or Human Sexuality, but I just watched a week of their national convention, and I need them to admit the historical existence of George W. Bush" - Bill Maher 

Good old Bill Maher, bloviating host of HBO's "Real Time" (one solid reason HBO does not count me as a subscriber). He's a real laugh fest, beginning with how he lost his ABC late night gig when he ridiculed the mentally challenged. 

Let's not forget his use of the "c" word in describing Sarah Palin and other female conservative spokespersons.

Now Bill Maher is jabbering about the Republicans and the fact that they are not as obsessed with George W. Bush as he is.

Bill, perhaps we need YOU to admit the historical existence of the pitiful candidates YOUR PARTY ran against Bush.

AL GORE and Joe Lieberman: The Dems thought he was a shoe-in until he began opening his mouth. Between Gore's really unlikeable demeanor and outright baldfaced lies, the resulting close race which was ended by the courts will most likely leave people like Bill gnashing their teeth until they die. The Dems should take heart of an observation by radio host Hugh Hewitt: If it isn't close, no one can cheat. The fact is, Al Gore was a lousy Vice President and he had all the charm of a zombie. The guy couldn't make his worldwide global warming concert turn a profit.

Later poor Al got dumped by his missus after he was busted for sexual advances towards a masseuse. The poor slob just can't buy a thrill. Dems thought he was real POTUS material, though.

Poor Joe Lieberman, who is basically a nice guy, is probably still facepalming over why he decided to be Gore's running mate. EPIC FAIL.

John Kerry and John Edwards: Kerry tried to run as a war hero ("I'm John Kerry and I'm reporting for duty!") after he served in the Navy and earned a purple heart for injuries that Mama could have fixed with a "boo-boo kiss". Kerry then tried to get us to forget he PROTESTED the war and threw his medals over the White House fence (which turned out later NOT to be his medals... he lied). How about his whopper which detailed his News Years Eve experience in Cambodia, which his former commanding officer flatly denied? Kerry was a clusterflop of biblical proportions, and perhaps the worst candidate the Dems fielded since Mondale. He earned the nickname of "Herman Munster", even though his namesake was at least likeable.

John Edwards: He has the dubious honor of being an even worse candidate than Kerry. This "preening metrosexual slug" (a term coined by conservative commentator Mark Steyn) made a fortune as an ambulance chasing attorney who extracted huge settlements from corporations.

After the defeat of the Kerry/Edwards ticket in 2004, John Edwards became a true public figure when he had to end his run as the Dem nominee for POTUS in 2008. It turns out that Edwards had a mistress, whom he had knocked up while his wife Elizabeth was gravely ill with cancer (she later died). Edwards was indicted for misuse of campaign funds but weaseled out of all the charges due to technicalities. Nonetheless, both his political and legal career are over. THIS is the man a guy like Bill Maher would have elected to be 2nd in line to the POTUS and possible future POTUS.

Yet Bill Maher wants to whine about the Republicans trying to forget Bush, after the wonderful candidates the Democrats offered up to beat the man they still consider to be a complete idiot.

Perhaps it's Mr. Maher who's in denial over a forgettable history of lousy presidential offerings.

'Nuff said.

DNC Worships Obama With a Sand Statue

Now the Democratic National Convention has gone overboard in its Barack Obama Lovefest with a funky looking sand sculpture of the POTUS that will greet everyone as they come to the convention:

Let's take a gander at other famous leaders who had monuments erected to them while they were still breathing:

Fidel Castro

Vladimir Lenin

Herr Fuerher, Adolph Hitler

Josef Stalin

Chairman Mao Zedong

Che Guevara

Ego knows no bounds.

'Nuff said.

Successful Mitt, or President Crybaby?

I copied this gem from an internet forum:

Successful Mitt, or President Crybaby?

So the Romneys are selfish for keeping a horse? And employing a groom with a family to support. And paying for feed that's sold by someone with a family to support and transported in trucks by someone with a family to support and manufactured in a factory by people with families to support from stuff that's grown by farmers with families to support. And having a barn built by construction workers with families to support with materials trucked by drivers with families to support from factories with workers with families to support. 

Sounds to me like that one horse has done more to put Americans to work than that horse's ass in the White House. 

'Nuff said.

R.I.P. Neil Armstrong (1930-2012)

Neil Armstrong, the first man to step upon another world, has passed on to an even greater place.

Rest in peace, Commander Armstrong. You were a true American in a time when we need heroes.

http://news.yahoo.com/first-man-moon-neil-armstrong-dead-82-u-191252056.html

Now HuffPo Is Bagging On Makeup... ZZZZZZ

And today's Bowl O' Stupid award goes to:

The NOTHINGTON POST (Huffington Post, the Zsa-Zsa blog)

Today HuffPo links to an article that dishes on Fox News anchors because (according to the HuffoPo Style Section) they wear too much makeup.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/23/fox-news-makeup-women-anchors_n_1824659.html

Gee folks, are we getting desperate here, or what?

Left Wing Media has been jealously broad-brushing Fox News for years, calling the network of bunch of liars, accusing them of unfair reporting, and now... their female anchors look like prostitutes.

Fox News has been the # 1 rated Cable News Network by far for years, and the Lefties can't beat them at their own game, so they sling dirt out of pure desperation. The same has been true of their treatment of Rush Limbaugh and other conservative talk show hosts. Can't out rate them? Then destroy them.

Here's a typical Fox News anchor, Monica Crowley:

Real overstated makeup there, huh? She should just be ashamed of her streetwalker look! Watch out, Lady Gaga, here comes Monica!

The LW media goes after makeup now, after their attempts to paint Fox News anchors as blonde airheads turned out to be an EPIC FAIL... you see, Monica here has a PhD. A fellow morning anchor, Megyn Kelly, another blonde bubblehead, has a degree in law from Columbia. The list goes on.

Even funnier is that the article compares Fox News anchor makeup with the "light makeup" of MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.

RACHEL MADDOW? Puleeeze... Maddow is openly lesbian and her on-air look is a concession to her bosses, as she tries to appear gender-neutral. I don't think your average woman is into the androgynous look.

Let's compare Monica to the owner and founder of The Huffington Post, the lady herself:

Ms. Arianna Huffington, also known to the rest of us as Zsa-Zsa, thanks to her annoying nasal accent.

By her blog's standards, she looks like a hooker. An old, tired hooker.

I guess I'd look old and tired, too, if I had to spend so much time hunting down useless crap to fill up the bandwidth on my blog.

Napolitano Accused of Sexual Harassment? Hmmmm

Our wonderful, mediocre-at-best Homeland Security Czar, Ms. Janet "Skunk-head" Napolitano, is now busy pulling a Clinton and denying allegations that Homeland Security has become a feminst dystopia:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/12/tagblogsfindlawcom2012-freeenterprise-idUS100993432920120812

Where's the Liberal Outrage Noise Machine today? Does it go into Automatic Ignore Mode whenever an Obama appointee exhibits the famous double standards approach?


If the lawsuit is accurate, it stands as an example of what happens when you turn a government agency into a henhouse run by angry man-haters who wear their feminism on their sleeves.

So what's the priority here? Protecting citizens from foreign and domestic terroism, or kicking around a bunch of men and denying them promotions as payback for the sins of their ancestors?

If there is any single reason to eject Barack Obama from the White House, it's for his appointment of morons to run departments that have a national, even international, impact.

Watch now as his other lackey, Eric Holdout, runs to Skunk-head's aid.

Stay tuned. This will get interesting as long as the Republicans don't let the Democrats bury this.

Mr. Biden, Your Ignorance Is Showing... Again

Vice President Joe Biden, an unintentional celebrity over his dumb, racially insensitive banter, has now proven he also knows nothing about business.

On the campaign trail, Obama's Loose Cannon was attacking his critics over their assertion that Biden doesn't know the difference between "outsourcing" and "offshoring".

"What difference does it make?" hollered Biden at his audience. "You don't have a job!"

BZZZZZZZZZZZT! Wrong, Mr. Biden.

It's obvious the V.P. needs better show-prep.

We know offshoring means domestic jobs leaving, Mr. Biden, but it's a fact that most of those jobs are low-tech and don't require much skill. Even call centers don't take an extraordinary amount of training, and yet the trend of sending those jobs to India came about because a lack of qualified people domestically.

AND, outsourcing doesn't mean sending jobs overseas, or even losing jobs, Mr. Vice President.

Outsourcing is a smart way for many small businesses to free up their limited resources on things that matter most, like growing your business.

A good friend of mine runs an outsource company, which performs accounting, payroll, and business operating services for small businesses. These small businesses don't need a full time accountant, and they don't need to spend a huge amount of their time with mundane but necessary accounting tasks.

Also, my friend's company employs five people.

No jobs are lost here, Mr. Biden. Outsourcing presents a unique opportunity for entrepreneurs to create specialized services to help insure success of other businesses. A doctor or lawyer running a private practice doesn't need to spend evenings running a Quickbooks program.

Also, my friend's company offers consulting services to help small businesses use available technology to operate their businesses more efficiently and even plan growth. And as needs grow, my friend's business will grow and hire more specialists.

SMART PEOPLE outsource when it makes sense and holds down bottom line. Since Joe Biden has been part of the Government Machine since The Who recorded "Quadrophenia", I guess he can't be expected to know how to run anything efficiently or within a budget.

Yet, he bloviates about it, anyway.

I'm wondering at this point if Mr. Obama has considered the merits of outsourcing Biden's function to a more  professionally run service.

Nahhhhhh... Joe Biden has "experience", remember?

Liberal Elitists vs. the Average Guy

Remember folks, the Democrats have always run campaigns where they claim they are the party that really cares for Average Joe, who makes up the backbone of the U.S.A., while Republicans want to see Joe starving in the streets or enslaved to eeeeevil dea-end low-paying jobs.

Then just google around blogs or Craigslist political forums and feast your eyes on what labels Liberal Democrats have placed upon all that they hate:

The farmers who grow our food and meat are referred as to "hicks".

The guy who changes the oil in their expensive Prius or BMW is a "service monkey".

The legal firearms owner is a right wing gun nut.

Wal-Mart is a legalized slave plantation.

The stay-at-home mom is an idiot who has never worked a day in her life.

The religious believer is a deluded "fundie" who hates science.

The owner of a large personal vehicle is an environmental rapist.

Anybody without a college degree is an illiterate moron.

The Fox News audience is "brainwashed".

The Obama critic is a hooded Neo-Nazi.
The wealthy man is a lazy, profiteering pirate.

The unborn are parasites.

A Republican is a selfish, fat, buck-toothed, NASCAR-loving buffoon

Chick-Fil-A is a "junk food" restaurant.

All pastors are child molesters.

Ronald Reagan was the enemy of all mankind.

Pro-Life advocates screaming anti-abortion extremists.

The United States is the most selfish, wasteful nation on earth.

Feel free to add more labels as you wish!

And remember... "You didn't build that."

Elitism 101

                                                      ANY QUESTIONS?

Where Obama Has Taken the Country

From the "The Peoples' Cube Blog:

'Nuff said.

If The Christians Bashed Chick-fil-A...

...the Lefty Democrats would be chirping in unison about what a wonderful chain of restaurants Chick-fil-A is, with the restaurants' offerings of fresh grilled white meat chicken, healthy sides of veggies, and air-popped fries.

Instead, CEO Dan Cathy's politically incorrect opinions about gay marriage have earned him such stellar criticisms from the Lefty Blog-o-Sphere as running a corporation that serves "junk food" and "crap on a bun".

Funny how that works, huh?

Say the wrong thing and The Left suddenly decides white meat chicken is "junk food".

Too funny!

Newest On the Democrat Hate List

It's that eeeeevil company....

Chick-fil-A.

How dare Dan Cathy, the CEO of Chick-fil-A, hold an opinion that is contrary to the bandwagon consensus of the Liberal Left.

How dare Dan Cathy exercise his 1st Amendment religious freedom rights.

Once again, the Left is whipping up a frenzy over nothing, calling the ignorant villagers to come running with their pitchforks and torches.

Rahm Emanuel. ex Obama cabinet member and frustrated do-nothing Mayor of Chicago, was first to lead the charge with his "these are not Chicago values" comment.

So, Mr. Emanuel, traditional biblical values are not "Chicago values"? Chicago has an enormous black population, and blacks are 80% evangelical Christians.

On top of that, Mr. Emanuel, those are OLD TESTAMENT biblical values. Aren't you supposed to be Jewish, Mr. Emanuel? I guess you're not very Jewish, are ya?

How about the Mayor of Boston following suit and attacking Chick-fil-A? I guess he forgot Boston is a city that is overwhelmingly Catholic.

Gee, liberals, thanks for blathering all about freedom and tolerance while demonstrating you have none of the latter and are doing the best stomp out the former.

So, what's next on the Hate List? The Democrats have demonstrated once more that they can only unite around values that Nazis cherish. 

Does Anybody Take Nancy Pelosi Seriously?

Asked in a recent interview about President Obama's support for Israel, good old Motormouth Nancy once again stumbles out a barely intelligible comment about Obama's willingness to sell Israel military equipment.

Wow. Just wow. Let's forget that Obama insulted Benjamin Netanyahu and also bowed to our enemies. Lefties don't care that Obama supports Israel with lip service.

Does it ever occur to Nancy not to drink before a live interview?

And why is anybody even asking her about foreign policy? Isn't she the same fool who wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a foreign visit to the same guy who the Syrian Rebels are currently trying to boot out of Damascus? You know, another fine member of the Muslim Brotherhood, namely Bashir Assad?

Mrs. Pelosi, stop trying to be Henry Kissinger. Every word he utters displays his infinite wisdom, while YOU, Mrs. Pelosi, can barely string together a handful of words.

Nancy Pelosi is proof of the ignorance of the tyipcal Northern California voter. 

"You Didn't Build That!"

Right, Mr. President, American business didn't build the government infrastructure. If American business had been pivotal in the creation and operation of the government infrastructure, it would run a whole lot better than it does right now.

The infrastructure is incredibly expensive and poorly maintained, something American business would never tolerate. American business would slash the top-heavy, inefficient administration by dumping useless, overpaid managers, and increasing efficiency through automation.

This is how American business survives: by doing things better and holding down costs. Infrastructure just demands more money from the businesses and private citizens it claims to serve.

Thanks again, Mr. President, for not thinking before you speak.

"What a Fool Believes..."

Imagine the famous Doobie Brothers song playing as you read this.

From a Democrat and Obama supporter posting in a political forum:

"Mitt Romney has NEVER worked for anything in his life. He never earned anything. It has all been handed to him. If we hand him the country, he will squeeze all the money out of it and lead us directly into a depression. He is only in this for profit, not the American people."

And just what is Obama doing with the country you Democrats overwhelmingly "handed over" to him? Looks to me like he has squeezed all the money out of it for the next generation. At this time, the country has 82 trillion in liabilities and only 2 trillion in income.

In the private sector, that's a recipe for bankruptcy.

And I'd like to see what the fool who posted this nonsense calls "work". I guess there's no work involved in restructuring the Olympic Games event to help it actually pay for itself.

There must have been no work involved in administering Bain Capital's salvaging of dying companies and making them profitable again, right?

Looks like another mushy-brained O-bot fell for the "lie repeated often enough" tactic.

When will Democrats like this learn that silence is the best substitue for brains?

The Bloviator-In-Chief Does It Again

If you're a business owner, according to President Obama, a.k.a. Mr. Big Government, you didn't build that business. You had all kinds of help from BIG GOVERNMENT, and BIG GOVERNMENT deserves the credit.

According to commentator Brit Hume, this is just another example of how your POTUS is entirely beholden to the primacy of BIG GOVERNMENT.

Obama, however, conveniently omitted where BIG GOVERNMENT got all the money that helped it grow so big and intrusive.

Taxes... from guess who? BUSINESS.

So, President Obama, who really helped who? And can we expect an honest answer from you?

Who knows?

The Sad Irony About Democrats and "Transparency"

The irony is that the Democrats are playing the Superior Morality Card and demanding the kind of transparency from Mitt Romney that Obama only lied about.

If the Democrats are so worried about "transparency", perhaps their POTUS should display some first.

After all, it was OBAMA who promised a "transparent" Administration.

Mitt Romney should offer more tax returns in exchange for Obama's college transcripts or other personal information he keeps blocking from scrutiny.

Ya think?

At Least Romney Made The Effort....

...to go and present himself before black people.

It took GUTS to walk into what could be perceived as enemy territory, and Mitt even scored a few points.

That, of course, escaped the brilliant mind of Nancy Pelosi, that gleaming tower of intellect, as she sputtered her comment about Romney purposely trying to get booed by the crowd. It's too bad the people of San Francisco aren't smart enough to see what a fool she is.


But I digress. Did you know Obama has yet to speak before the NAACP? Gee, I thought he was the 'black peoples' president.


I guess He can't find time between hanging out at George Clooney's house and jet-setting to Europe, not to mention his demanding golf schedule.

Talking Points, More Important than FACTS

The Obama campaign is running expensive TV ads bashing Mitt Romney over claims of "outsourcing jobs" to foreign countries while he was on the excutive board of Bain Capital.

The problem is, the ads aren't backed up by the evidence.

Here's a link to an article by FactCheck.org:

http://factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-outsourcer-overreach/

Extensive investigation into the claims by the Obama campaign reveal that there is NO evidence that Mitt Romney is personally reponsible or even approved the offshoring of ONE job, let alone a few hundred.

On top of that, the number of jobs in question is relatively small.

Why is it that nobody screamed when McDonnell-Douglass shut down its Long Beach manufacturing facility and transeferred the construction of its modified MD-80 passenger jets to the Peoples Republic of China? Literally, thousands of high-paying jobs evaporated. Could it be that no one made a peep because McDonnell-Douglass is a UNION shop and UNIONS still deliver millions of dollars to Democrats all over the U.S.?

But let's fret instead over whether Mitt Romney let a hundred jobs a picture frame making factory go to China instead. That's MUCH more serious.

President Obama, how stupid do you Democrats think the rest of us are?

I can only begin to guess.

Funny How That Works...

Michelle Obama got booed at a NASCAR event, and before you knew it, the Democrat blogs and various liberal pundits had NASCAR branded as a "redneck sport" whose fans were made up of drooling village idiots.

President Obama told a lame joke at a Red Sox game, and got some boos from the loyal Boston fans.

So why aren't Red Sox fans a bunch of double-digit IQ retards?

Can you say "double standards", boys and girls? I knew you could.

So, Now It's 'Pocky-Stawn"...

Ever since President Obama uttered those famous sound bytes (I say toh-may-toh, you say toh-mah-toh), I've noticed other news services picking up on this and using the Obama-faux-Pakistani pronunciation for the country we now know as "Pocky-Stawn".

Are the news services trying to cover for the President's odd-sounding utterances (remember "corpse-man")?

Or does President Obama now dictate how those who love him will speak?

Talking Points! Squawk! Pretty Bird!

Democrats all over the internet faithfully copy 'n' paste the most popular Democratic Party Talking points as part of the DNC's "new media" campaign to attract younger voters.
Of course, these talking points are presented as "fact" with no critical analysis (despite the fact that liberal Democrats are famous for claiming they hold the monopoly on critical thought). Here's a list of popular topics posted on a Craigslist forum with some honesty tossed in by me:


REASONS TO VOTE FOR OBAMA 

•Obama has overhauled the food safety system 
All by himself, nonetheless(smirk)! So why are we still getting salmonella recalls for that wonderful fresh lettuce Michelle wants us to eat?


•Advanced women's rights in the work place
Like the right to hold your employer hostage for a few months because you decided to get pregnant? I think an employer is being incredibly generous to keep hold your job for you, pay you for no work, and hire a temp to do your work for you while you enjoy motherhood. It stops being generosity, however, when you run to your liberal representative and make it a mandatory burden on a business owner.

•Ended Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT) in our military
So are the military recruitment offices now swarmed by gays wanting to join the service? Not really. It was just more posturing by the military-hating Left.

•Stopped defending DOMA in court.
Soon you will be able to marry your cat. Thanks, libs!
  
•Passed the Hate Crimes bill.
Another bill that favors chosen people while ignoring the majority.
 
•Appointed two pro-choice women to the Supreme Court.
Uh, I thought judges were supposed to be appointed based on their legal experience vs. their polittical views. This an admission that the Left prefers to enforce the Tyranny of the Minority through the courts. Screw what the majority thinks!
 
•Expanded access to medical care and provided subsidies for people who can't afford it.
All paid for by...... YOU AND ME. Liberals are so generous with other peoples' money.

•Expanded the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
Another burden states can't afford, thanks to our crappy economy.
 
•Fixed the preexisting conditions travesty [and rescissions] in health insurance.
Which could have been done WITHOUT nationalizing healthcare.

•Invested in clean energy.
...in companies that went bankrupt. Need I say more?

•Overhauled the credit card industry, making it much more consumer-friendly.
With 2000 pages of new regulations in addition to the 1000's that failed before. Good job!

•While Dodd-Frank bill was weak in many respects, it was still an extremely worthwhile start at re-regulating the financial sector.
See the previous response.
 
•He created a Elizabeth Warren's dream agency: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Oh, boy, another expensive bureaucracy, named after the phony Indian Princess.

•He's done a lot for veterans
So did his predecessor. In fact, his predecessor took the time, and still takes the time, to visit and pray with wounded warriors, while Obama parties at George Clooney's Brentwood Palace.

•He got help for people whose health was injured during the clean-up after the 9/11 attacks.
That may be one of the few things Obama got right. His batting average is still pretty piss-poor in comparison.

Hey Democrats, why aren't you chiming about Obama "saving" General Motors? Could it be the latest news that GM is once more anemic, in debt, and that wonderful expensive Volt is the least popular model GM makes? Oh, snap, Obama proves once more that he's an amateur when it comes to business.

Remember Kids, Profit is EVIL....

To hear a liberal spout off about it, it's not just evil, it's....

EEEEEEVIL!

Profit-motivated enterprises like insurers and banks are the spawn of the devil, and their only concern is to fatten the wallets of CEO's and shareholders.

But wait, Hollywood celebrities, rock stars, and entertainment moguls are filthy rich, and doing everything in their power to protect and market their "intellectual property", all in the name of.... p-p-p-p-p-p-profit...

Just look at the huge houses Tom Cruise and third ex-wifey are going to split up. The guy has a net worth of almost half a billion dollars. Why doesn't anybody from the Left point fingers at guys like Tom?

Because he's a member of the Left Wing Aristocracy, like the Kennedys, who can be making as much filthy lucre as they like, flaunting it as much as they like, and keeping it in overseas banks like everybody else, as long they write big fat checks to the Democrats and pull the lever for anybody who's name on a ballot sits next to a big "D".

THAT is the 2-faced nature of liberal Democrats.

Mitt Romney once headed up a private capital firm that sometimes laid people off to save a company's bottom line and resurrect what was left of it. All in the name of that "evil" profit.

Tom Cruise works in an industry famous for firing people. Basically, once the movie is done filming, most of the crew heads for the unemployment office unless they've been contracted for another project. Nobody on the Left whines about this. The sad fact is, Hollywood has thrown more people away than 10 Bain Capitals.

This is the nature of Leftism. It's all about pointing fingers at Conservatives for doing the same things Leftists hide under the rug.

Welcome to Soft Tyranny

Obamacare has been found Constitutional.

By 2014, everybody MUST carry some form of health insurance or be penalized by the Tax Man.

The sad part of all this is that most of the Middle Class, who PAY the taxes that support public healthcare facilities, are UNQUALIFIED to use the services they help pay for.

Basically, if you earn a paycheck beyond 50K, you help subsidize a system for which you can be fined, garnished, or even jailed if you try to use it.

Sweet deal, huh? Welcome to left-wing America, where you're punished for pulling your own weight.

After all, it's up to the hard-working earners to make society more "fair" for those who made poor life choices.

Thanks, Democrats.

Regardless of what Liberals Say About Obamacare...

...health care is not a "right".

Just because the taxpayer is being expected to pay more and more, through taxation, for the 'rights' of everyone else to have "free" access to comprehensive medical care, we cannot realistically expect that it is considered a "right".

A "right" is undeniable, no matter what, with no repercussions for exercising that right. You cannot be denied it for any reason, such as the right to legal representation in court, regardless of ability to pay.

In the case of public healthcare, using that "right" is conditional.

For example, if you get treated for lung cancer from chain-smoking cigarettes, you will then be compelled to join a smoking abatement program. If you're treated for high blood pressure due to obesity, you're compelled to go on a diet and stay away from the Big Macs. If you show up in the hospital covered in scabs and suffering from hepatatis due to drug addiction, you're sent to rehab.

There will be numerous conditions placed upon your life by an ever-growing nanny government, all created in your "best interest" by an ivory tower elite who know better, much better than an idiot like you, what's best for your life. Remember that.

Every time you depend on your government for something, you kiss one more piece of your freedom goodbye.

Think about that as you applaud government healthcare. How much fealty must you now give to the King (Big Government)?

Bush Derangement Syndrome: Alive And Well

Another knucklehead in a political forum spouted off on how President Bush didn't serve his country, and that he was a coward for serving in the National Guard during Vietnam. I went off on this guy, because he had previously admitted that he didn't enlist in the military because he was basically anti-war.

I pressed this guy repeatedly on the notion that he thinks National Guardsmen don't serve their country. He finally relented and agreed that people who enlist in the National Guard, which is a branch of the Army, DO serve their country. Score 1 for the good guys.

But this tool kept saying that Bush was still a coward. I enlightened him that Bush flew combat aircraft, which few people can even physically handle due to the G forces involved in high-speed flight. It takes brass cajones to fly any jet, especially a military aircraft. The leftist dolt then stupidly quipped:

"Wow, I really got you mad. You're so thin-skinned".

After screaming Leftists continuously accuse anybody who his critical of their beloved President Obama of being a hooded Klansman, you're damn right I'm getting a little thin-skinned.

By the way, what branch of the miltary did Obama serve in? Why is it OK that Bill Clinton dodged the draft?

For Leftist stooges, President Bush is the man they'll always hate worse than Adolph Hitler. And THAT sums up Bush Derangement Syndrome.

Barack Obama: Scaremonger-In-Chief

Once again, the President is running around spewing doom-and-gloom prophecies, as he attacks the budget proposal of Republican Congressman Paul Ryan (who, in my humble opinion, knows more about economics on a grand scale than Counselor Obama will ever know).

Obama's throwing out the typical fearmongering lines, including (I paraphrase) "Schoolkids are going to starve!", and "Thousands of elderly won't get their medicine!" (this is especially ironic, since the POTUS already mentioned a while back that it may be more expedient for the gubmint if granny settles for pain pills instead of a hip replacement).

Of course, Ryan's propsal doesn't single out either of these things, this is just what OBAMA threatens to cut if the Ryan budget were to be passed.

Here are some things you WON'T hear from the President as he attempts to sell us on his massive spending increases:

"If the country adopts these "draconian" Republican spending cuts..."

"...Government agencies like the NSA will find it more difficult to fund "conferences" in places like Las Vegas".

"...college professors making 6 figure salaries might lose their housing allowances."

"...Government employees would be forced to contribute a small portion of their wages to their pensions and healthcare plans."

"...there won't be any money to loan to alternative energy companies like Solyndra."

"...public universities won't have any way to fund correlative studies that prove Republicans are stupider than Democrats."

"...I might run out of "Obama Money" to buy votes with."

"...there won't be any grant money to fund important research projects like the life cycle of the now-extinct Screw Worm."

"...Government employees might lose their "company cars".

"...the national Bullying Awareness Campaign would have to be cut."

"...young males would have to buy their own prophylactics at the Circle K."

"...there won't be any funding for works of art that feature a cross in a jar of urine."

"...school adminstrators won't get their offices redecorated."

"...the government won't be able to issue debit cards which can be spent on lap dances."

"...we won't be able to fund sex change operations for convicted felons in prison."

"And what about the algae? How will we find a better a way to grow algae?"

If President Obama had the SLIGHTEST bit of intellectual honesty, he'd see just how much of the working man's money is being WASTED, yet he continues to LIE to the public about the effects of not adopting his spending increases which are guaranteed to send the United States into financial ruin.

It's time to end the hyperbole, get real, tighten our belts, and send Obama back to the community he supposedly helped to "organize". Let's give him a second shot to try and get that right.

'Nuff said.

Where is L.A. Mayor Villaraigosa?

Why hasn't this stupid sorry excuse for a leader, who can't wait to get his ugly mug in front a camera, grown a pair and come out about the rash of pedophiles that are being busted in the LAUSD school system?
Like a die-hard liberal, he doesn't have the stones to make even a lame attempt at apologizing to the families that were traumatized by teachers employed during his watch.

He's too busy prepping himself for his emcee's gig at the DNC to be concerned with a major problem that is doing even greater damage to his already underachieving school district.

It's no surprise that California's largest and worst school district is in the hands of Los Angeles' worst mayor.

If  "Mayor Pothole" had any class at all, he'd be publicly apologizing and promising to do whatever he could to fix this problem and do his best to make sure it never happens again.

But guess what? He has said NOTHING.

Tony Villar, you gutless wonder, your silence speaks volumes.

California's Latest Delusion: High Speed rail

...and their ringmaster, Jerry Brown

Brown, the unqualified dolt who helped California begin it's current path of insolvency by allowing public employees to unionize, is still trying to force the fiasco called 'high speed' rail up the noses of California's residents.

When you look at the people pushing their propaganda to get this project going, it becomes clear that Brown is simply trying to attract Federal money into California to shore up a budget shortfall he can't fix, and also pay back the unions that funded his campaign through a generous government pork program that will benefit union labor exclusively.

The Unions formed their own shill advocacy group called the Alliance For Jobs (it should be more honestly called the Alliance for UNION JOBS), and are broadcasting propaganda radio spots featuring comedian Will Durst (a mediocre talent who is probably more than eager to take any money thrown his way).

What Brown doesn't talk much about is that the 6 billion dollar test section of the system runs from Bakersfield to Fresno (Gee, I could DRIVE that route in 90 minutes!). What does it benefit the taxpayers to build a build a bullet train that goes to 2 places NOBODY cares to visit? Highway 99, a.k.a. the "Truckers' Highway" is dotted only with cheap motels and truck stops because Central California is nothing but farms and oil fields.

WHY do we need to build a rail system through this neck of California, where it is guaranteed NEVER to pay for itself?

California has once proven it's good at only 1 thing: stupid decisions that cost honest, hard working people lots of money.

Yet, we want knuckleheads like this to run the country? Sure. Just get me a lobotomy first.